The Essex Result of 1778 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Essex Result of 1778 - Assignment spokespersonThe text explains that the unless occasion when the supreme business office can take control of the inviolable rights is only when the good of the whole requires it. If the supreme power is acting only for some mortals personal interests by pickings control of the inalienable rights of each individual, thus the supreme power is usurping the power. Each individual should receive a counterpart when surrendering his/her inalienable rights for the supreme power to be fair. In other cases, the supreme power is a usurper and if it acted in such a way that the individuals do not have placidal liberty, then the power is illegal and the individuals are not bound to obey. This extract is directly linked to the invention of usual sovereignty as presented by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau through the school of the social contract. The main concept of popular sovereignty is that the consent of the governed gives legi timacy to the rule of law i.e. the population who forms a society, a politic body or a state are the true source of legitimacy to the supreme power through their consent and it is not the supreme power which holds its own legitimacy through the power it has been awarded by the population. This concept is central in many democracies and it is, therefore, no surprise that we shall encounter it in the critical level on the draft constitution for Massachusetts. Furthermore, the concept of popular sovereignty also tackles the idea that each individual enters a social contract with the supreme power where he may surrender some of its inalienable rights receiving in return protection from the dangers and hazards of the state of nature. If we consider this extract to be in direct confederacy with the ideas of the social contract and the popular sovereignty as stated by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau we cannot dissociate this extract from the value of the Enlightenment as these philosophers a re the founders of this movement. However, it would be rhetorically poor to draw this conclusion with such a simple analogy.